tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851246794143905627.post5059427744659705251..comments2023-07-27T17:53:21.938+10:00Comments on Idiom Zero: Review: The HobbitNichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11736478220623231400noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851246794143905627.post-12441219950878744552012-12-31T11:48:56.371+11:002012-12-31T11:48:56.371+11:00I completely agree with you.
Peter Jackson has a...I completely agree with you. <br /><br />Peter Jackson has added way too much and has subsequently changed tale of The Hobbit. The first installment of Jackson's The Hobbit depicts a story less like The Hobbit and more like a great battle between everyone in middle earth except between those of whom the book is actually about. The book presents a battle between a wizard, hobbit and a group of dwarves firstly against a journey and then against a dragon.<br /><br />Jackson's need to have the antagonist orc is ridiculous, so too is his need to have comic relief from everyone and everywhere except from the really funny parts of the book. For example, his depiction of the stalling before the trolls turn to stone was more than just disappointing. It was depressing. The only part in the movie that I believe Jackson depicted well was the riddles between Gollum and Bilbo. Other than that, all of the good and funny parts of the book were sadly lost.<br /><br />The best part of the movie for me was Gollum. He was done really well, I detested him, pitied him, and loved him, everything that I think should be felt toward Gollum.<br /><br />Here's hoping the next one is better. It sure as hell won't be shorter though, Jackson obviously doesn't know the meanings of short and sweet and getting to the point.Alinoreply@blogger.com